Drucker’s method for beating a stronger competitor

William Cohen, first graduate of Drucker’s PhD program, shares the revolutionary management consultant’s approach to overcoming stronger competitors

Add bookmark

drucker method beating stronger competitor

Drucker recommended four essentials for management, including competitions. One of these essentials works especially well when going up against a stronger competitor, however, although its use is ancient, it is infrequently emphasized today.

In started in China, 2,000 years ago, when Sun Tzu was a successful general, military strategist, writer, and philosopher. His book The Art of War remains a classic and is studied in war colleges around the globe. It contains an important recommendation, which duplicates one of Drucker’s four essentials and underscores its importance. Moreover, this essential has broader applications than just warfare.

The critical essential

Sun Tzu wrote: “If you know your enemy and know yourself, you need not fear defeat in a hundred battles. If you know only yourself, you will lose half. If you know only your enemy, you will lose all.”

In this single sentence Sun Tzu summarized the importance of self-knowledge in most endeavors. Self-knowledge is especially important in situations in which you must compete against strong competition. This includes athletic competitions, contests of all types and of course business.

Regardless of your occupation or the size of your organization, this recommendation will affect your success. While many emphasize knowledge of the competition, and this is certainly important, little is said about the importance of self-knowledge. Yet, as emphasized by Sun Tzu and Drucker, it is of even greater importance.

The most decisive battle in history

Let us look at warfare first. The most decisive battle in history was the Battle of Cannae, in which an entire Roman army was destroyed by a much smaller force. The Battle of Cannae was a key engagement of the Second Punic War between the Roman Republic and Carthage, fought on 2 August 216 BC near the village of Cannae in Apulia, southeast Italy.

The Roman attacking force of 86,000 under consuls Paullus and Varro was pitted against a far smaller Carthaginian force of 50,000 assembled with allies from different African tribes. It was commanded by the Carthaginian general, Hannibal.

The Romans had chosen the battlefield and made the decision to attack. It was on their home ground and in their familiar territory. But familiar ground and numerical superiority were only two of the advantages enjoyed by the Romans that day.

The Carthaginian Army had made a long, tiring and dangerous journey, which included crossing the Alps less than two years earlier. Their army had suffered from this journey and, was comprised of many foreign tribes recruited as it crossed Africa. These allies spoke different languages, had different customs, religions, weaponry and reasons for fighting.

This complicated not only Hannibal’s strategy but also his basic communications and authority on the battlefield. Hannibal was a master of both leadership and strategy however. He knew his diverse forces and organized them to maximize each ally’s advantages and minimize their disadvantages according to their weaponry, customs and unique expertise. He took advantage of their diversity, usually thought to be a disadvantage, and was one of the first to demonstrate the advantages that might be gained.

Hannibal divided and placed his strongest allies on the flanks of his army. His alignment included a relatively weak center but with strong forces on either flank. The troops at his center were instructed neither to charge nor retreat, but to retreat orderly as the Romans advanced, while remaining in physical contact. The strong allied forces on either flank were ordered not to maneuver, but to hold their positions and to neither advance nor retreat until he signaled their action.

The Roman cavalry was positioned at the rear of their advancing infantry. By maneuver, Hannibal moved his own cavalry around the battlefield to engage them. They defeated each of two Roman calvary cohorts in succession by concentrating first against one and then moving on and attacking the other. This happened while the main body of Roman infantry continued to advance.

The Roman commanders ignored the cavalry action as they focused their attention against the weak Carthaginian center that, while fighting, was clearly retreating even while the Carthaginian allies placed on the flanks held to their original positions. The Roman commanders smelled victory and continued to press forward, increasingly rapidly and completely oblivious to the danger from the immobile Carthaginian troops on their flanks.

After defeating the Roman cavalry, Hannibal’s victorious cavalry attacked the unprotected rear of the advancing Romans. Responding to a signal, the two strong flanks swung inward like giant gates, closing on the Romans with the cavalry at the rear, until they were completely encircled.

The Carthaginian center stopped its rearward movement and instead pressed forward. The Romans were now totally encircled and crushed by the cavalry at the rear and the strong forces on their flanks while the now advancing center applied pressure at their front.

They could not escape and were unable even to use their weapons effectively. The slaughter was over quickly. 95 per cent of the Roman Army, was left dead or dying on the field of battle, yet the fight had begun with the Romans being far superior in numbers and having all the advantages. Hannibal won at Cannae because of his superior leadership and strategy. Both were enabled because of the self-knowledge of his own diverse forces, which he employed with devasting effect.

Become a PEX Network member and gain exclusive access to our upcoming digital events, industry reports and expert webinars

The 61-year-old who won a 540-mile ultra-marathon on his first Race

From 1983 and 1991, thousands of runners converged in Australia annually to run the 543.7mile  Westfield Sydney to Melbourne Ultramarathon. Because of a voluntary six-hour rest stop at night, it took five days to cross the finish line and not everyone made it.

It was one of, if not the toughest, of the ultramarathons. Only the best athletes, usually under the age of 30 and in top physical shape, even attempted it. Most winners had the financial backing of top sports sponsors including manufacturers of major brands of sporting goods.

In 1983 however, a 61 year-old senior by the name of Cliff Young showed up and registered to compete. He was without sponsorship. Many, including reporters, thought it was a joke or a publicity stunt. Young had been raised on a 2000-acre sheep farm and, according to him, while moving the herd to market yearly, the sheep frequently scattered. To keep control, he had to run on foot. This required several days without sleep or rest leading him to claim that he would have no trouble competing in the race even though this was his first time.

Others had their doubts as he was not particularly impressive physically and was twice the age of most competitors. He did have self-knowledge of the advantage which running with the sheep had afforded him, however. He had developed a slow shuffling gait, which he maintained at a moderate speed, but unlike his competition, without rest or sleep.

Athletes in this ultramarathon ran for around 18 hours and then rested at night. This took five days, but there were no rules about stopping. The objective was simply to get from Sydney to Melbourne. Most thought Young would not be able to complete the run without sleep every night but he not only ran the distance without sleep using his shuffling gait but, much to everyone’s amazement, he won, setting a new record for the time and was presented with a AU$10,000 prize that he had not expected.

He succeeded because of his self-knowledge from his sheep herding experience. He knew that he could go without sleep and that, while his running shuffle was not fast, it could be maintained without sleep, even for 540 miles and in less than five days.

How Einstein became world famous when not promoted

Albert Einstein was unknown and working for the Swiss Patent Office in Bern at an entry-level job. In 1905, a year in which he had been passed over for promotion, he decided to use his spare time to develop theories he had only been thinking about.

He had no computer, no white-coated assistants, not even a chalkboard or any special financial support. Nevertheless, in one year he wrote and published four major scientific papers, partly completed while at work, and became world famous. He was eventually awarded the Nobel Prize for physics and his work in this one year included both the Theory of Relativity and the equation for the conservation of energy, probably the most famous equation in the world. How did he do it?

What Einstein did have was the ability to visualize complicated results from the conclusions of others and combine them into images and equations which could be readily understood. Einstein used his self-knowledge to more than make up for his competitors’ advantages. Through using his self-knowledge, he became known as the greatest theoretical physicist in the world.

Have you explored and used Drucker’s self-knowledge essential? You probably won’t find it in any textbook, but it is even more powerful than competitive analysis.

*Syndicated internationally. The author can be contacted directly at wcohen@stuffofheroes.com

References

Peter Drucker on Consulting: How to Apply Drucker’s Principles for Business Success (LID, 2016)
Peter Drucker’s Way to the Top (LID, 2019)


RECOMMENDED