Have Confidence in Your Statistical Analysis!: Learning How to Use Confidence Intervals
Posted: 08/17/2009 5:10:00 PM EDT | 5
|
|
- Why are point estimates useless for making decisions?
- What is the best confidence level?
Why are Point Estimates Useless for Making Decisions?
Example 1: Suppose I measure the hardness of five steel parts, and the measurements are 57, 55, 57, 56 and 55. The mean of these measurements is 56. Usually, we expect this value to represent something about a larger population of parts. The population mean µ cannot be known with certainty, but the sample mean, 56, is our best estimate of the population mean, based only on these five parts. The number 56 is a point estimate of the population mean.
Read more
|
Contributor:
Andy Sleeper |
-
Are You Spending Too Much on Six Sigma Training by Spending Too Little? -
Why Managers (And Project Managers) Can’t Manage—And What to Do About It -
Too Many Six Sigma Tools, Too Little Time -
Using Lean Six Sigma Methodologies to Dream with Customers: A Xerox Case Study -
How to Make Good Decisions in New Product Development -
Can Lean Six Sigma Training Be Done Online? -
You Need More Than Just an Analytical Mind—Four Qualities That Identify a Successful Six Sigma Belt Candidate -
New Employee Training on Continuous Process Improvement—Strategies and Methods to Touch Every New Employee -
Facilitating Six Sigma Project Meetings -
The History and Simplicity of Lean Process Improvement
* = required.
|
Its nice article. I think the example 3 is reversed in mentioning Type I & Type II risk.
|
Replies (0)|
|
Agreed this is a good article. A point estimate may though not be another useless number. If the standard deviation is already well known, such as a test for which a comprehensive GRR has been performed (where repeats >>10) or a control is being run on a frequent basis, then the std dev from these can be used. The std dev from these can be much better since it's based on far more repeats. A finite interval is given even when the number of repeats is 1. Use the Z in that case. A greater amount of repeat measurements is needed when one wants a tighter range of 95% conf limits.
|
|
|
Hi rschweiger, Initially I also thought the same way as you did. Your statement (rejecting good part is type I risk) also correct. If we see the type1 risk in confidence interval perspective, wrongly estimating the population mean is type 1 risk - ie., our calculated confidence interval do not have population mean. Example if we calculate CI 100 times by taking samples from population, we may be wrong 5 times for 95% Confidence interval, but we do not know when this 5 times going wrong is not known. In this example type 1 error is 5%. Type 1 error for CI is risk based on result of estimation. Type 1 error in sampling inspection is risk based on result of action taken.
|
|
|
thanks for sharing the article.
|
|
|
Excellent article. Do you have your Type I and Type II risks reversed in examples 3 and 4? Usually, rejecting something when it is actually good is the Type I risk. Or am I being overly simplistic and/or missisng something?
|
-
Process Excellence Masters Online Event
November 6, 2012
Register Now -
Lean Six Sigma in Our Uncertain Economy: How to Avoid Common Deployment Pitfalls and Achieve Accelerated Results
November 5, 2009
Register Now -
Balanced Scorecard + Lean Six Sigma = Superior Execution?
December 1, 2010
Register Now -
German Language Webinar: Wie Business Execution die Wahrscheinlichkeit drastisch erhöht, dass Ihr Unternehmen die gesteckten Ziele erreicht
July 21, 2011
Register Now
|
Reach Process Excellence professionals through cost-effective marketing
opportunities to deliver your message, position yourself as a thought leader,
and introduce new products, techniques and strategies to the market.
Learn More >> Learn how to sponsor a webinar with us? Join today and interact with a vibrant network of Process Excellence professionals, keeping up to date with the six sigma industry by accessing our wealth of process excellence articles, videos, online seminars, live conferences and more. Sign Up Today! |
| Process Excellence Network, a division of IQPC 2013 All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement, Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Careers With IQPC | Contact Us | About Us | Cookie Policy |
|
Not a member? Sign Up
Reasons for Joining
Address your challenges through knowledge sharing with peers from our global network of specialists.
Benchmark your business initiatives with the who's who in the field.
Hear from industry pioneers how to maximize ROI in today's challenging economy.
And best of all It's FREE!